Chase Sense With Why.

  For those who still want, feel and think that we have the freedom to think in America – think about how an abortion saves a woman’s life any more than a C-section would. It makes sense that a C-section would be safer for the mother.

  Obviously, the C-section is safer for the baby cuz you don’t have to abort it in a C-section, but the safety for the baby depends on how many weeks along the mother is. An abortion puts the baby out of its misery from being born prematurely by C-section but if the mother is many months along then a woman can have a C-section and save the baby’s life and he or she can be put up for adoption.

  But why is an abortion dangerous for the mother? I would contend that if people will be honest about statistics and look at statistics – there are probably more women that die from giving abortion than from giving birth or having a c-section.

  In retrospect even if my notion is incorrect about statistics more c-sections should be encouraged when the woman is pregnant for so many months particularly. If politicians and the people who follow these politicians do not want to encourage c-sections after a woman is say five or six months into her pregnancy versus encouraging abortion then that goes to show they’re not as concerned about the mother’s life as they are about wanting to harvest babies body parts once they abort them, or they are more interested in just killing babies for the sake of population control or to depress the mother and make her feel guilty and hurt the father and keep them oppressed or depressed throughout the rest of their lives.

  The way people are hustled into having abortions has not allowed the subject or discussion I’m having now to cause people to think and realize or even remember that “oh there are other options such as adoption.”

  I can understand why the subject of a C-section doesn’t come up if somebody’s considering having an abortion in the first month or first couple of weeks, however if C-section becomes and option that people are aware of then there might be some women who would prefer to carry the baby for five or six months and have a C-section. I’m not certain if five or six months is long enough to be safe for the baby to be birthed by C-section, but it’s not out of the question to assume that some women care enough about a baby’s life to consider extending five or six months, however the ones who would do that are thinking about adoption if they are not wanting to keep the baby and they might decide to go the whole nine months, because they don’t want to kill the baby because they view the baby as a human life in the womb.

  There are other things that people don’t think about very often and one of those is that abortions on demand actually give some boldness to pimps and rapists. If you think about it a pimp is not going to be afraid to pimp someone out who could get pregnant if they can just go have an abortion or force them to have an abortion if they get pregnant well doing the job of pimp wants them to do. And by the way let’s not stereotype pimps as being men. There may actually be more female pimps than there are male pimps. However a lot of people just pimp themselves out for money for drugs but most people that do that usually just steal, threaten (hustle for money), beg or they might basically pimp themselves out periodically when they want to.

  People often qualify the freedom of abortion or the freedom of murder technically, because of rape situations. But in reality how often do rapes happen that get women pregnant? If you think about it a lot of true rapes end up in a lady being murdered or a man being murdered if a man has been raped. In essence rapists are not people who love sexual pleasure they are people who love to steal and to hurt people. Violent rapists are more about violence than sex because rape is not really sex – it’s violence + theft!

  Rape is taking something that somebody is not offering to give, and doesn’t care about how the other person feels or thinks and those who don’t care about how a person feels or thinks and wants to violate their body does not care if they’re going to bring pain to somebody and may have a propensity to like to bring pain to somebody or to steal their life too. I explained that because you have something called date rape which can include two people being drunk and things going faster than they wanted or somebody getting pregnant while they were drunk and didn’t intend it to happen and then sometimes they call that rape but it is often consensual if both people knew they were getting a drunk and getting into the situation, however there are also people who are lured into sex through one person getting the other person drunk and not consenting to sex prior to getting drunk and that scenario is usually labeled as rape but it is technically deception and can be described in other ways. It is wrong but it’s not the same as what I’ll call a third degree rapist who is out to steal by force, and usually in that situation is out to kill then ends up murdering their rape victims.

  If you analyze further if someone seduces someone into sex by purposely getting them drunk even if they do consent to being drunk while the person seducing them is not getting drunk themselves, but they didn’t agree to the possibility of having sex prior to getting drunk – that is still a form of hustling and stealing so in that sense it is a rape by stealing through deception while someone is temporarily mentally impaired. There could be more ways to describe that but the subject here is not really about analyzing all that – it’s about assessing how many people actually get pregnant through rape? The likelihood is that most abortions approved by Democrats are NOT from rape cases.

  The main point to the subject of how many people get pregnant through rape situations is that I don’t think that happens as often as people act like it does.  I’m not saying it doesn’t happen often – it most likely happens too much, and once is too much also.

  I’m saying that I think most people want an abortion because they may have purposely gotten pregnant and then their boyfriend breaks up with them or something or they are angry at each other and then they just run and get an abortion too fast while they’re angry at each other. Then the political side who promotes abortion encourages them to hurry and have an abortion, and it the politicians use the excuse of promoting abortions because of rape but most of these situations are not rape situations.

  Personally I have a hard time believing that there are a large number of men who don’t want a woman to be happy. I think most men like doing everything they can to make a woman comfortable and happy. And I think that’s most natural with men when they are attracted to a woman and are engaging in relations with a woman. However there are some mean men but there are also some mean women who do not love their neighbors.

  I will close this blog by pointing out what I wanted to point out in the beginning and that is the fact that a lot of abortions actually tear the baby apart inside the woman’s body and that’s dangerous to a woman’s body and it’s gross. And that’s why I think it’s more dangerous for a woman to have an abortion than it is to give birth because they tear the baby up inside the woman’s body and they cut it apart. That is one of the methods that I’m aware of and as far as I know it’s still the main method of how abortions are performed.

  Don’t forget that condoms and birth control pills can both be promoted as well, however I would always be hesitant to take a birth control pill because it might not be good for you or it might not work all the way and the baby survives but the birth control pill might damage the baby – and that’s just a speculation of possibilities on my part.

  The bottom line is that it is good to have overturned “Roe v Wade.” It was good to overturn it because it was inconsiderate of all the things I just spoke of in this blog.

  If there are going to be abortions – they should be in the earliest stage of pregnancy, although I would prefer them to be outlawed at all, and suggest that if you didn’t want a baby the woman shouldn’t have gotten pregnant or the man shouldn’t have gotten the woman pregnant, and I think there should at least be a block on abortions for people who were not involved in a rape situation. 

  I don’t think we’ve even discussed the fact that people get abortions who were not raped. People get abortions sometimes who don’t want abortions because their pimp, rapist, husband, family, parents or boyfriend force them to get an abortion.

  That goes to show there’s another whole side of the abortion subject I’ve never even heard talked about before, and that’s the fact that there should be laws against having an abortion because somebody is forcing another to have an abortion. Therefore if someone is seeking to have an abortion because of rape – then there should be some proof of rape and most of all there should be a council recommending a counseling meeting that makes sure the victim is not pressured into an abortion but rather has considered adoption. If a person still wants an abortion after having counseling that encourages adoption, and they have proof of having been raped then that seems like the only time that the law should have any leniency to possibly allow an abortion in the very early stages of pregnancy. That does not mean I’m convinced or have peace of mind that the law should allow for abortions at all or whatsoever because it’s not the baby’s fault that someone was raped; it’s the rapists fault.

  It makes sense to punish the rapist and not punish the baby with a death penalty. Certainly it is no fun to carry a baby from an attacker who forced the baby inside of a woman, however, I find it hard to blame the baby for that or to hate the baby for that. 

  I Believe In Christ and I believe in exercising against hate and revenge for anybody, but I do believe in Justice and justice would detain the violent rapist for the safety of the public and for the peace of the woman who is carrying the baby until she gives it up for adoption, because she shouldn’t have to worry about that man stalking her down while she’s pregnant. That scenario considers there is no option of abortion, and makes sense for the baby and protecting the woman plus the baby from the rapist by having him detained.

  I presented that full scenario because when evaluated from that perspective one can recognize it is not necessary to abort the baby if the rapist is detained, however if the rapist is on the loose and is not detained for the safety of the baby and the mother – then the pregnant woman can be put in protective custody or then they might qualify considering an abortion by our government if the morality side of politics isn’t 100% successful.

  We should not forget that there should also be an option to do a C-section. However when you think through the C-section once again there may be a certain number of months one has to carry a baby before it is safe to do a C-section. I do not know the exact month of safety for doing a C-section.

  Either way the laws should definitely reflect the fact that counseling should always be had before an abortion if the abortions are going to be considered a legal procedure by the government (not by God).  

  If abortion in the early stage of pregnancy is deemed legal by the government (not by God) then abortion should be a last resort and the questionable law should reflect the fact that abortion should be the last resort, and it should only be legal for certain cases such as rape,  but that is not the way the Democrat party has been conducting abortions. Democrats and their abortion industry have conducted abortions for any time somebody wants an abortion and they’ve also conducted abortions when a woman does not want abortion and somebody’s forcing them to have an abortion. The Democrat party’s abortion industry have used abortions to sell baby parts and they’ve made it into a money making business for their scientists. Probably the climate change scientists or that community. The same climate change scientists I heard reported on Fox News to have received 7 trillion dollars from COVID studies. The same climate change scientists who support racist evolution theories.

Sense-Chaser Bob, October 23, 2024

Chasing sense makes sense

Learn-Y

http://www.httpswhycs.wordpress.com